DOJ launches criminal probe into E. Jean Carroll: Sources

DOJ Initiates Criminal Investigation Into E. Jean Carroll

DOJ launches criminal probe into E Jean - The U.S. Department of Justice has begun a criminal probe into E. Jean Carroll, the former Elle magazine columnist who previously alleged sexual assault by President Donald Trump. Multiple sources, who have been briefed on the matter, confirmed the development, stating that the investigation is focused on whether Carroll made false statements during her civil lawsuits against the former president. These suits, which resulted in a $5 million award for her, are now under scrutiny for potential perjury. The inquiry marks another step in the DOJ’s ongoing efforts to examine claims against Trump, following a pattern of legal challenges targeting his adversaries.

Focus of the Investigation

The probe, according to sources, aims to evaluate the credibility of Carroll’s testimony in the civil cases. The allegations of perjury stem from her accounts of being sexually assaulted in a department store dressing room during the 1990s, which were central to the lawsuits. Trump’s legal team has sought to challenge these claims, arguing that Carroll’s accounts were inconsistent or exaggerated. The investigation could lead to criminal charges if evidence is found that she intentionally misled the courts. This move has drawn attention to the intersection of civil litigation and criminal accountability, highlighting how the DOJ may use one legal avenue to bolster another.

Recusal of Key Figure

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche has stepped down from overseeing the investigation, citing his prior role as Trump’s legal representative in the case. His recusal underscores the potential conflict of interest in the DOJ’s actions, as his involvement might have influenced the outcome of earlier proceedings. This decision has been noted by observers, who argue that it ensures impartiality in the new criminal inquiry. Blanche’s absence may also signal a shift in leadership within the DOJ, as the case moves to a different team under the direction of Andrew Boutros, the U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois.

Media and Legal Timeline

CNN was the first to report on the DOJ’s decision, revealing that the probe is being led by Boutros. The U.S. Attorney’s office has been actively involved in the case, which has since gained broader attention. Carroll’s participation in the Time100 Gala on April 25, 2024, in New York City, was captured by Evan Agostini of Invision/AP, serving as a visual reminder of her public profile and the ongoing legal battles she faces. The investigation comes as part of a larger strategy by the DOJ to target individuals or entities linked to Trump, with previous efforts encountering resistance from courts and grand juries.

Context of DOJ Actions

The DOJ’s current probe is the latest in a series of investigations targeting Trump’s critics. These cases have often faced hurdles, including challenges to evidence and procedural objections. For instance, in 2023, Trump was found liable for sexually abusing Carroll, leading to a $5 million judgment. A separate defamation lawsuit, decided in 2024, also resulted in a ruling against him. The two cases, though related, were distinct in their legal arguments and outcomes. The new criminal investigation adds another layer to this legal landscape, potentially reshaping the narrative around Trump’s accountability.

Carroll’s attorneys have not commented on the probe, leaving room for speculation about their strategy. Meanwhile, a Justice Department spokesperson declined to provide details to ABC News, maintaining a cautious stance on the matter. The lack of public statements from both sides has fueled debates about transparency and the motivations behind the DOJ’s action. Some analysts argue that the probe is part of a coordinated effort to pressure Carroll into settling or retracting her claims, while others view it as a legitimate attempt to uncover potential legal misconduct.

Recent Court Rulings

"Not demonstrated that the district court erred in any of the challenged rulings," stated the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in its 2024 decision. This ruling dismissed Trump’s attempt to overturn the 2023 judgment, which held him responsible for sexual assault. The court also rejected his argument that evidence of a billionaire paying Carroll’s legal fees proved she lied about the funding during her deposition.

These decisions have been pivotal in reinforcing the validity of Carroll’s claims. However, Trump has not given up, requesting that a federal appeals court in New York pause its ruling on the defamation case so he can appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. His legal team is seeking to argue that the court’s earlier rejection of his immunity claim and substitution of the United States as a defendant were errors that warrant further review.

Broader Implications

The criminal investigation into Carroll is part of a larger pattern of DOJ actions against Trump’s opponents. This approach has been both praised and criticized, with supporters arguing that it ensures justice, while critics claim it reflects partisan bias. The case also raises questions about the legal standards for criminal charges in civil litigation contexts. If Carroll is found guilty of perjury, it could set a precedent for holding individuals accountable for their testimony in high-profile cases.

As the probe unfolds, it remains to be seen whether the DOJ will find sufficient evidence to pursue charges. The investigation’s success may depend on the availability of new evidence or testimony that contradicts Carroll’s accounts. Meanwhile, the broader legal battles involving Trump continue to dominate headlines, with each development adding to the complex narrative surrounding his presidency and personal conduct. The outcome of this probe could have significant implications for both Carroll and the DOJ’s strategy in addressing claims against Trump’s allies and critics alike.

Public Reaction and Future Steps

The news of the criminal inquiry has sparked mixed reactions. Some view it as a necessary step to ensure the integrity of the legal process, while others question the timing and thoroughness of the DOJ’s actions. Legal experts have noted that the probe may face challenges, particularly in proving intent to deceive. Despite these uncertainties, the case remains a focal point for discussions on accountability, truth, and the role of the DOJ in shaping public perception of political figures.

With the investigation now in motion, the next phase will likely involve interviews, document reviews, and potential charges against Carroll. The U.S. Attorney’s office is expected to present its findings to prosecutors, who will decide whether to proceed with criminal proceedings. This development comes as Trump continues to seek higher courts to reverse previous rulings, indicating that the legal battle is far from over. As the DOJ moves forward, the case will serve as a test of its commitment to impartiality and the strength of the evidence underpinning its claims.